A second opinion on every close call.
Catch-alls, role inboxes, greylisted domains: some addresses never give a clean yes or no. The Analyst reads the same receipts you do and tells you, in plain English, what it would do and why. You still decide.
It reads the receipts so you don’t have to.
The Analyst sees exactly what you see: the server reply, the MX record, the score. Then it writes down its reasoning, not just a label.
- Why risky
- It’s a catch-all. A clean reply proves the domain exists, not the mailbox.
- What I’d do
- Fine to keep if you’re a warmed-up sender. Cold? Hold it for a small, separate send.
- Confidence
- Medium, the ceiling for a catch-all without a test send.
Reasoning, not another score
No “61/100, good luck.” The read says what the evidence shows, what’s uncertain, and what the sensible move is for a sender in your position.
Auditable, like everything else here
Every read cites the receipt it worked from. If you disagree with the call, the evidence is right there to argue with.
It recommends. You decide.
The Analyst never silently drops or keeps a row. Its recommendation sits next to the verdict, and the export still follows your choices.
On the rows worth a second look.
Most of a clean list needs no analysis. A deliverable is a deliverable. The Analyst spends its reads where judgment is actually required.
- On any single check. Ask for a read on any verdict, quick or deep, and get the reasoning behind it in a couple of seconds.
- In list reports. After a scan, the close calls are flagged and ranked, so you review ten rows with judgment instead of ten thousand without it.
- Metered honestly. The AI read is the one genuinely expensive step, so it’s the one thing that’s metered: 25 a month free, 500 on Pro. Checks barely cost us anything, and they’re priced accordingly.
The close calls are where lists go wrong. Get a read on yours.
25 reads a month on the free plan, enough to settle every genuinely ambiguous row in a small list.
Common questions
What does the AI Analyst do?
It reads the same receipts you do on the close calls (catch-all, role, greylisted) and tells you in plain English what it would do and why. You still make the final call.
Does it replace the verification?
No. The verdict and the SMTP receipt come first. The Analyst is a second opinion on the ambiguous ones, not the verifier itself.
Is it free?
There is a free monthly allowance of AI reads on the free plan. Pro raises the ceiling.